Topic: Variations in Standard Tuning

[Mr.OMuck]

I play a lot of Big Bill stuff, and I've become aware over the years that he had his own version of standard tuning.
Someone with a more analytical frame of mind and better musicological skills, John Miller, for example would be able to nail down which notes are flat or sharp and to what degree they are one or the other, and if it remains more or less consistent over time. Me, I just know it don't sound right if the guitar is IN tune. I know he always kept his high E a bit sharp, yielding that wonderful, piercing punctuation resolve at the end of a lot of phrases. But it goes on and on. Gary Davis definitely had his own idea of in tune, one that lends a slightly dark character to his sound. In fact I can't think of any of the major players who didn't arrive at some slightly idiosyncratic manner of tuning to "standard". Whadaya think? Have you been through this already?

[Rivers]

Great topic O'Muck, surprising it hasn't come up before so far as I can tell by searching though I have a nagging memory of it being discussed before somewhere, maybe a previous incarnation of WC. I guess Sam Collins had some pretty individualistic ideas on what sounded good. I added a 'tuning variations' tag so we stand a better chance of being able to find it again.

[dj]

A few years ago we touched on Ishmon Bracey's reported preference for a somewhat non-standard tuning while discussing 16 bar blues.  Just follow the "16 bar blues" tag to get there.  It's on the second page of the topic.

[uncle bud]

Actually, I'll quote it here, as it's worth repeating:

I remember an article by David Evans in an early Blues Review Quarterly describing a visit to Ishmon Bracey in the 60s.  Evans asked Bracey if he still played, and when Bracey said he did, but only religious songs, Evans handed him a guitar which he considered perfectly in tune and which Bracey promptly fiddled with until it had that kind of "sour" (Evans's word, if I recall correctly) tuning that Bracey used on his  recordings.

"Sour" seems to me to be a good word for Bracey's idiosyncratic tuning. It's not limited to standard in his work either. One of the things I encountered in working on Suitcase Full of Blues, in Spanish tuning, was that it could sound too sweet. The "off" tuning Bracey has gives it a creepier quality.

There's a quote from JohnM in the quote generator that goes, "It doesn't matter if your guitar's in tune if you can hear in tune" (Riv, there's actually a typo in it that needs correcting - 'of' should be 'if').

[dave stott]

If I recall correctly, Big Bill, Brownie Mcghee and several others tended to prefer an unwound thrid string.

The use of that type of string will also allow for a "different sounding" regular tuning.


Dave

[Johnm]

Hi all,
This is indeed a fascinating topic.  I think Ishmon Bracey's "sour" sense of tuning is best demonstrated on his two takes of "Trouble-Hearted Blues", the first take of which, in particular, may give you a toothache.  Mr. O'Muck and Andrew have it right, I think, that the tuning affects so much more than just the perception of Bracey's pitch.  It also colors the feeling you get from his note choices and phrasing.  As I remember the two takes, which are discussed in more detail on the Bracey Lyrics thread, I think that at the time, I felt the second take was closer to being in tune in the conventional sense, and simultaneously less effective musically.
Re preferring an unwound third string, which Dave alludes to in the last post, I've never met a player who came up in the pre-War period who did not prefer an unwound third string.  There must have been some, but I never met one.
All best,
Johnm

[Blue in VT]

This very intersting...I've always found the Rev.s to be alittle "off" to my ear...not bad but not "normal" either...this topic explains alot.

not to hyjack..but JohnM's comment about the unwound third...does anyone play with one now...other than when playing slide?  I may have to give it a try just for fun...

Cheers,

Blue

[dave stott]

Hey Blue

I tried a few sets of Ernie Ball /  Earthwood brand Rock & Blues strings that come with an unwound third string.

it was a very nice sound and they lasted quite a while, but I just couldn't get used to the difference in sound.

My brain / ears  kept telling me one of my strings was slightly off in tuning.

Dave

[lindy]

This very intersting...I've always found the Rev.s to be alittle "off" to my ear...not bad but not "normal" either...this topic explains alot.

Dave Van Ronk told the story of traveling with Rev. Davis and purposefully retuning his guitar to concert pitch one time during the intermission of a performance, just to see what would happen. He said Rev. Davis sat down at the beginning of the second set, strummed Miss Gibson just once, and immediately started frowning. After a few seconds of resetting the miscreant string (I think it was his high E string) just right to his ear--a bit flat to ours--he started his performance. I heard Van Ronk tell that story in concert, and Elijah Wald has it in his book on Van Ronk.

As for whether or not y'all should try it, the short answer is if you want to bend your G string (standard tuning) at the second fret, it's the only way to go. If you don't play any songs that require or benefit from that bend, then there's less reason to do so. I still remember the song that JohnM taught us the day he suggested we all attend his class with an unwound third: I'm Going Away, by Robert Curtis Smith. Love that song, it's a mainstay in my noodling repertoire.

Lindy

[waxwing]

So, any of the crack ears (mine sure ain't one) want to hazard some guesses as to what string theses guys tuned off. So far we have that the Rev tuned his high E flat a touch.

As to unwound 3rds, I keep one on both my steady playing 6 strings, the little Stella and the Style O. I go a little lighter than normal with both of them, too, like an .018 or.020, on the Stella, which is strung with lights and would have about a .024 wound 3rd. This keeps the intonation closer to what it would be with the wound string and also adds to the bendability. I did have my guitars intonated for the unwound strings, tho'. I keep a wound 3rd on my '67 D-18S for the more modern sound of a van Ronk arrangement, say.

All for now.
John C.

[uncle bud]

Will be interested to hear other responses here but...

Working from memory here, not verifying with recordings (I'll leave that to the Rev. Gary Davis experts, of whom we have several ) , a number of RGD tunes also have slightly off bass strings. Whether this was simply happenstance or a more deliberate tuning strategy as was his high E is for better minds than mine.

For Bracey, and again without going to the recordings to confirm, I would say the third string, that potentially troublesome unwound G, is one, and possibly the second string. As I recall, in Suitcase Full of Blues, the top string was OK, but again, we're dealing with Spanish tuning there.

Had several glasses of wine so feeling lazy... 

[Johnm]

Hi all,
This has to do with a variation in tuning, but not strictly a variation in standard tuning.  Clifford Gibson, whom I've listened to quite a lot of recently, liked to tune his first string a couple of cents sharp when playing in Spanish tuning.  It ends up being noticeable because he loved to end his passes through the form by hitting a unison (theoretically speaking) of the second string fretted at the third fret against the open first string; a V note doubled up, which serves the function of sending you back to the beginning of the form.  On many of his recordings though, the unison ends up not quite being a unison, thus a little bit hairy-sounding. 
I think he may have tuned the first string slightly sharp because he liked to do some fairly extravagant bends at the seventh fret of the first string, and he may have found that if he started out with the first string in tune, by the time he'd stretched it a couple of times it was a good bit flat.  By starting it out a bit sharp, he may have felt he was giving himself a bit of wiggle room with regard to his bends. 
Of course, he may have just liked it sharp . . . .
All best,
Johnm

[eric]

Hmm... I just noticed this thread.  I'm not sure I follow all the theory here, but I'm relieved to find out I haven't been hearing things when I've noticed that some of our heroes seem to have their own variations on standard tuning.  Perhaps I'm not crazy after all...

[Johnm]

I guarantee you're not crazy with regard to this issue, Eric.  Some people tuned differently more or less consistently, like Rev. Davis and Joseph Spence.  Others were constantly blazing new trails, like Gabriel Brown and J. T. Smith.  It's a very interesting issue.

Incidentally, I've been resurrecting some old threads from back in the Main Forum, which currently has 37 pages (!!) of threads.  For those of you who have never dug deeper than the most recent posts, you might want to take a look there some time.  There are some interesting topics and discussions back there.
All best,
Johnm 

[GhostRider]

  Others were constantly blazing new trails, like Gabriel Brown and J. T. Smith.  It's a very interesting issue.
All best,
Johnm 

J.T. Smith... blazing new tuning trails    That's an understatment. His tuning was often toothache material.

Alex